ENVIRONMENT. COLOMBIA
INTRODUCTION
Here, some ideas about the environmental
approach of the engineers in Colombia and the administration of the environmental
topic in the country. In my loved
Colombia we have full of opportunities, but the policy of the government must
change if the country wishes a sustainable future.
WE NEED A CHANGE IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ADMINISTRATION POLICY
When I was at the university studying for my engineering degree, I heard about Greenpeace (Wikipedia, 2016) but the information
that I got in that time was like about radical people fighting against the
development. I was not able to imagine
the size of the conviction, effort and courage they had. It is possible that I was a victim of media
with biased information and I didn't understand the work that this organization
was making and, by other hand, the questions about what was happening in the
world were not enough important to me. Indeed,
there were a lot of young engineers like me focussed in their jobs with a
superficial inclusion of the environmental topic in their tasks. It is like we were illiterate about of the
environmental impacts and when the environmental topic appeared in our works we
were lost without idea how to make a good balanced decision.
But this situation is not a particularity of engineers,
is one generality in the country we are living.
The environmental administration in Colombia works in several topics:
different sources of water, biodiversity, urbanism and ecosystems. (MADS, 2016) . The environmental ministry has a huge
challenge in a country with high environmental importance in the world. It works with a big contrast between its
structured ministry with lots of programs and its bad performance when the
moment of the true appears.
Colombia is one of the most important countries
about water and biodiversity in the world.
The average amount of water in Colombia is six times the average of water
of the world (UNESCO, 2007) and because that culturally
it has not been given it the value, meaning and significance that it should
have (MADS, 2016) . For biodiversity, Colombia has several rankings,
for example, It has the first place for bird and orchid species, the second place for plants and amphibious (SIB, 2016) , but, as Brigitte
Batiste says, the biodiversity, like all the environmental topic, is coming to
light in a country with historical particularities and institutional conflicts. (MADS, 2009, pg. 27)
It is in these last words where begins the problems
of environmental administration in Colombia.
This country should have a strategy about its environment. Instead, Colombia has a well-structured and
well intentioned environmental ministry (MADS, 2016) but its job is not effective because the
administration is political and it has not the enough power to control the
activities of the different actors like regional governments, other
institutions and companies. The chair of
the environmental ministry is for paying political favors. In the last six years Colombia has had seven
environmental ministers (Wikipedia, 2016) , then the vision and
mission of this administration have a big charge of opportunism and constraints
for achieving their legitimate programs.
One sad example of this situation became known
in April when two big interests collided in the Macarena Park, one forest
reserve of the country. One company with
support of one office of the environmental ministry of Colombia got the right
to exploit oil and the community, that exploits the eco-tourism, disagreed with
this decision (The City Papers, 2016) . The communities won the fight, because the
government retired the rights despite of words of influential executives
defending the right of the oil company. Who
was the worst actor in that example? It
is difficult to know. The transnational
oil company intended to have a right of exploitation near to a forest reserve;
the government that put the profit first that the environmental reserve and was
not able to communicate the technical decision behind the right, or the
influential executives that showed with their words that the importance of the
forest is low comparing with the profit of the business (Colombia
Reports, 2016) . It is possible that the oil company and government
could have the reason, the project would not produce damage at the zone of the
Macarena Park, indeed it is near, not into, the forest reserve, but the communication
was not enough convincing and the fear for the mining activity near of the park
won the fight. This situation could be
produced because we are an immature society in the topic of environment and we
move our non-coherent opinions between the preservationism and utilitarianism
and we don’t have strong tools to find the optimum point for the environmental
decisions: Technical-scientific information, strong knowledge of our territory
and a strong environmental institution without political favor for paying.
In nowadays the climate change is not a scary
story or hypothesis, it is a current circumstance with serious consequences in
our life. Now, we suffer the
consequences of the anthropogenic disasters produced for irresponsible
decisions of oil companies, chemical, mining and governments (Wikipedia,
Anthropogenic Hazard, 2016) . The rate of deforestation continuous high,
the industrial fishing is not stopped and the mining without care of life or
biodiversity or the water sources is common practice. Also, there are a lot of communities that want
a better opportunities for their lives and that opportunities begin with the
exploitation of the resources that the nature gives them. A lot of communities are trapped in
non-balanced activities; the lack understanding of the relation between the
humankind and its environment; and the demonization of mining, agricultural and
industrial activities.
People with lack understanding of the
environmental issues, including here the engineers and the government executives,
are swinging between the preservationism and utilitarianism and they take them as
a religious topic without analyzing the best options for their particular
situation (MADS, 2009, pg. 6) . In a world with serious environmental
necessities, in a country with the same necessities and huge opportunities this
is a sad situation that needs a different policy of the government: stopping
the low importance that it is given to the environmental administration in
Colombia.
CONCLUSION
Colombia has opportunities in the environmental
global context if it changes the administration policy. The current environmental administration is focused
more in political favors than the real programs that the country needs. This produce a waste of time and resources that
the country need to increase the level of knowledge in the own environmental
reality and for taking the best decision for their development.
SOURCES
Colombia
Reports. (22 de April de 2016). Colombia state oil chief apologizes for
being a condescending jerk in fracking debate. Obtenido de
http://colombiareports.com/colombia-state-oil-chief-apologizes-condescending-jerk/
MADS. (Junio de 2009). Revisión de las bases
conceptuales de la Política Nacional de Biodiversidad. Obtenido de
https://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/BosquesBiodiversidadyServiciosEcosistemicos/pdf/actualizacion-politca-nacional-de-biodiversidad/5071_150310_anexo_1_fundamentos_conceptuales.pdf
MADS. (2016). Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo
Sostenible. Obtenido de Cultura del Agua:
https://www.minambiente.gov.co/index.php/component/content/article/1954-cultura-del-agua#documentos-de-interés
MADS. (2016). Ministerio del Medio Ambiente y
Desarrollo Sostenible. Obtenido de https://www.minambiente.gov.co
MADS. (2016). Ministerio del Medio Ambiente y
Desarrollo Sostenible. Obtenido de https://www.minambiente.gov.co
SIB. (2016). Biodiversidad en Colombia.
Obtenido de http://www.sibcolombia.net/web/sib/cifras
The City Papers.
(20 de April de 2016). Colombian authorities revoke oil rights near Caño
Cristales river. Obtenido de
http://thecitypaperbogota.com/news/colombian-authorities-revoke-oil-rights-near-famous-cano-cristales-river/12532
UNESCO. (2007). Agua y Educacion. Colombia.
Obtenido de
https://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/GestionIntegraldelRecursoHidrico/pdf/cultura-del-agua/Agua-y-educacion-Guia-general-para-docentes-de-las-Americas-y-el-Caribe.pdf
Wikipedia. (14 de Mayo de 2016). Anthropogenic
Hazard. Obtenido de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropogenic_hazard
Wikipedia. (13 de Mayo de 2016). Greenpeace.
Obtenido de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpeace
Wikipedia. (2016). Ministerio de Ambiente y
Desarrollo Sostenible. Obtenido de
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministerio_de_Ambiente_y_Desarrollo_Sostenible